Cooperative Learning And Assessment
Assessing, Evaluating, And Reporting
Student Learning
Assessment is the collection of data to make
a judgment. Evaluation is the rendering of a
judgment based on merit. Reporting is the communication
of the results of assessment and evaluation to interested audiences.
Cooperative learning groups can enhance and at times are required
for assessment, evaluation, and reporting--particularly when
performance, authentic, or total quality assessment is employed.
The Role And Benefits Of Cooperative Learning
In Assessment, Evaluation, and Reporting
Cooperative learning groups present unique and important opportunities
and benefits for instruction, assessment, evaluation, and reporting.
Using cooperative learning groups in assessment provides the
following advantages:
- Additional sources of labor to conduct assessments
and communicate results. Students are a natural source
of help and assistance to teachers when labor intensive performance,
authentic, or total quality assessment practices are used.
- More modalities to be used in the assessment and
communication process. Learning in cooperative groups
allows for assessment procedures that cannot be used when students
work alone, individualistically, or competitively.
- The possibility for more diverse outcomes.
Cooperative learning groups enable teachers to assess critical
thinking and level of reasoning, the performance of taught skills
(such as conducting a science experiment), the ability to communicate
knowledge, interpersonal and small group skills, self-esteem
and self-efficacy, and commitment to producing quality work.
- Additional sources of information. Cooperative
learning provides self- and peer assessments along with the teacher's.
- The opportunity for the continuous improvement process
to become an ongoing part of classroom life. Cooperative
learning groups offer a setting in which instruction, assessment,
and continuously increasing achievement can all be part of one
process. Total quality in education is based on the premise that
all school members are organized into teams working cooperatively
to continuously improve the processes of learning.
- A setting in which students may best learn (and create)
the rubrics used to assess and communicate about their work.
This helps students produce higher-quality work, understand feedback,
and assess classmates' work.
- The possibility for students to learn from the assessment
and reporting experiences. Learning is enhanced when
the assessment requires group members to discuss the accuracy,
quality, and quantity of their own and each other's work.
- Less possibility of teacher bias affecting the assessment
and evaluation process. Frequent sampling and evaluation
by a variety of others in addition to the teacher provides a
broader base of data for evaluation, a wider range of perspectives
in applying criteria, and the potential for consistent patterns
of interpretation to occur.
- The support system necessary to implement the improvement
plan that results from the communication of the assessment results.
Communication of results must directly point toward what needs
to be improved and what the students do next.
- The opportunity to assess group as well as individual
outcomes. There are times when a groups' scientific,
dramatic, or creative projects need to be assessed.
- The means to make assessment procedures congruent
with ideal instructional methods. Instruction and assessment
procedures need to be aligned so they work for, not against,
each other. Cooperative learning tends to result in higher achievement
and a variety of important outcomes (Johnson & Johnson, 1989)
that are aims in education.
Cooperative Learning And Seven Principles
Of Assessment And Reporting
Cooperative learning plays a major role in the seven principles
of assessment and reporting. Those principles are (Johnson &
Johnson, 1996):
- Make an assessment and reporting plan. The
plan should identify learning and instructional processes, outcomes
to be assessed, and the setting in which assessment will take
place.
- Use cooperative learning groups and understand their
benefits in assessment, evaluation, and reporting. Numerous
benefits are described above (also see Johnson, Johnson, &
Holubec, 1993).
- Avoid the use of "pseudo" groups or traditional
learning groups in your assessment plan. Such groups
are characterized by social leafing, free riding, hostility among
members, sabotage of each other's work, and a variety of dysfunctional
behavior patterns.
- Ensure that learning groups are truly cooperative.
Cooperative learning groups are characterized by positive interdependence,
individual accountability, face-to-face promotive interaction,
the appropriate use of interpersonal and small-group skills,
and group processing. It is cooperative learning groups that
promote higher achievement, more positive relationships among
students, and greater psychological health.
- Make assessment practices an integrated whole by
implementing procedures before, during, and after instruction.
Before instruction specify objectives, design relevant instructional
tasks, establish criteria for success, specify the processes
of learning through which students are to reach the criteria,
and establish the plan for collecting the information needed
to assess students' learning and the success of the instructional
unit. During instruction, conduct observations, assess social
skills, and interview students. After instruction assessments
may include paper and pencil achievement tests, measures of actual
student performances (such as compositions, class presentations,
portfolios), or critical thinking through academic controversy.
Group products can also be used for assessment and reporting.
Students can assess themselves and their groupmates with checklists,
tally sheets, rating scales, rubrics, or open-ended reflection
sheets.
- Involve students, classmates, and parents, in reporting
assessment results. Student-teacher conferences enable
each student to discuss with the teacher individual progress
in reaching learning goals, incorporating the student's, teacher's'
and cooperative group members' assessments in the dialogue. Student-led,
parent-teacher conferences enable each student to be accountable
for communicating learning (and learn the skills needed to do
so) by being in charge of the conference.
- Use cooperative learning groups to help individualize
the educational goals, learning processes, assessment procedures,
and reporting procedures for gifted and disabled students.
Cooperative Learning And Levels Of Assessment
When cooperative learning is used in instruction and assessment,
there are two levels of assessment and evaluation--the individual
and the group. Individual assessment is more frequent than group
assessment, but both are important. Since the purpose of cooperative
learning groups is to make each member a stronger individual
in his or her own right, a pattern to classroom learning is created
where students learn in a cooperative group, individually demonstrate
their learning, then debrief the learning in their cooperative
group (for examples of group-individual-group applications see
Cooperation In The Classroom and The Nuts
And Bolts Of Cooperative Learning).
References
- Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1996). The role of
cooperative learning in assessing and communicating student learning.
In T. R. Gusky (Ed.) 1996 ASCD yearbook: Communicating
student learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision
and Curriculum Development.
- Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Holubec, E. J. (1993).
Cooperation in the classroom (6th ed.). Edina, MN:
Interaction Book Company.
- Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Holubec, E. J. (1994).
The nuts and bolts of cooperative learning. Edina,
MN: Interaction Book Company.
|
Navigation
Home
Cooperative Learning Q&A
Essays (on home page)
About the center (on home page)
Newsletters (on home page)
Books and supplies
Contacting us (by email and
otherwise)
The U of M College of
Education and Human Development
The University of Minnesota
Etc.
Except as noted, the contents of this site are copyright ©
David and Roger Johnson. About
reproduction. |